Monday, September 13, 2010

Movie Review: Harry Brown

Here's Justin checking in with a review of Michael Caine doing his best Charles Bronson impression.

DVD Discovery Dirty Harry Brown Michael Caine insists you get off his lawn Justin Senkbile What's the scariest thing in the world? According to freshman director Daniel Barber's Harry Brown, it’s a sad, emphysematous old man. The eponymous vigilante, played by Michael Caine, is scary in the way all revenge picture heroes are: he has a gun, an idea and nothing to lose. Harry shoots and stabs his way past various riffraff while barely blinking an eye. And, although it has plenty of problems, the picture itself is equally brutal.

In a matter of days, quiet, gentle Harry Brown finds himself grappling with the loss of his wife, Kath (Liz Daniels), after a prolonged sickness, and the murder of his best friend and chess partner, Leonard (David Bradley). The murder seems to be linked to the brutal gang violence that's recently been swelling in and around Harry's apartment complex, violence that the police seem either unable or unwilling to take on.


He doesn't talk about it much, but Harry is an ex-Marine with a large collection of medals. And somewhere between his friend's murder and a botched mugging under a bridge, Harry reconnects with those military roots and decides to take matters into his own hands. This is just about the time that detectives Alice Frampton (Emily Mortimer) and Terry Hicock (Charlie Creed-Miles) begin investigating Leonard's death.


Although the tag line on the poster (“Every man has a breaking point”) begs for it, Barber avoids the typical dramatic “moment of decision,” and the moment Harry moves from domestic solitude to gun-toting neighborhood watchman is hidden quietly away. Harry himself is unusual as a revenge picture protagonist in that he's neither hellbent on retribution nor obsessed with noble ideas of justice. He seems lost in a vacuum, killing without remorse but without any apparent catharsis and hunting down his prey without a set plan but with complete confidence.


It's a brisk 103 minutes to the bloody finale, and in that time Harry Brown manages to do some strange things. At times, the film seems to be trying to widen its scope, introducing new characters and providing details on minor ones. Then, just a few scenes later, everything narrows down to Harry again. Caine's muted, naturalistic performance seems almost minimalist. Barber unfortunately never completely strikes a balance with these two styles and the result, although it has few dull moments, leaves many loose ends.

The one thing the movie does perfectly (or, at least, viscerally) is depict the slum world of the neighborhood gangs. It's overflowing with random violence, hard drugs and sloppy gunslinging to such a degree that, although not entirely believable, it is disturbing and fully felt.


Harry Brown
is entertaining and affecting enough for your run-of-the-mill vigilante story, leaving several images and impressions that are hard to shake. But it ultimately fails to reconcile its two stylistic extremes and get a handle on itself. It's a bit too over-the-top for one to take it to heart and yet too dark for one to really enjoy the extravagance.


Grade: C

Follow me on Twitter!

Labels: , , , ,

Custom Search

Friday, July 10, 2009

Weekend Battle Plan: Go totally gay

In theaters

Look, you probably know if you're going to see Bruno already. If you saw Borat, did the impression for everybody (which sucked but was funny at first because you thought it was so good, then annoying because everybody did it, and then funny again because you are so incredibly lame), and know who Ali G is, you'll be seeing the movie. If you're a conservative who is terrified by the gays, if you found Borat to be "stupid" or "insulting," or if you've ever watched "The 700 Club" for more than 4 minutes without laughing, reaching for the remote, or retching, you're not going to see this movie. Personally, what I hope happens is that people go and spark up a dialogue. Why is it offensive to you (gay or straight)? Is the stereotype of Bruno's character blowing up the classic imagery in a postmodern way or is it just throwing kerosene on a flaming image? Things like that are GOOD for society, to have to confront those thoughts and ideals that we pretend aren't there. As a staunch supporter of gay rights (as it's a civil rights issue and all...), I'm happy that the film is out there making people squirm. Plus, it's funny as shit. Ron Paul deals with a pantsless dude, and Paula Abdul sits on a Mexican because Bruno convinces her he hired him as furniture. Seriously, that's funny. Whether you find it too controversial, too over-the-top, or love the stuffin' out of it, the one thing we can all agree on is that nobody is going to go see I Love You Beth Cooper. Sorry Christopher Columbus and Hayden Panitierre (who isn't as cute as people think and is as talented as a well-salted soda cracker).

That's my recommendation: Get some laughs and some social perspective with Bruno.

On DVD

I've decided I'm a full-fledged supporter of Knowing, the wacky sci-fi movie from director Alex Proyas and hairpiece underling Nicholas Cage. Why? Because it's wacky sci-fi! It's a "Twilight Zone" episode with bigger effects. Seriously, the plot (a guy finds a time capsule with predictions of disaster in the future) and even the ending (I won't reveal it, but wowza it's out there) would be right at home in the old TV show that I love (I kept turning it to the SyFy channel marathon last week, but everyone kept changing it to Wimbledon...really, people, who watches Wimbledon that doesn't say crumpet or "bloody 'ell?"). Rent it, enjoy it, even if it's weird. The effects alone are worth it. Honest.

That's my recommendation: Nicholas Cage movies that don't suck are like Haley's comet. Catch Knowing to celebrate.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Custom Search